Ferrari accuse Brawn of arrogance

• FIA set to announce hearing verdict on Thursday• Jenson Button's grand prix wins likely to stand An official ruling over the legality of Jenson Button's Brawn-Mercedes, the winner of the first two races this season in Australia and Malaysia, was expected tomorrow after an uncharacteristically turbulent meeting of the FIA's international court of appeal in Paris today.Most formula one insiders believe that the Brawn's so-called "double diffuser" – a key aerodynamic accessory which dramatically enhances tyre grip at the rear of the car – will be decreed to be legal. But even if the verdict does go against Button and the Brawn team, it is expected that the formal verdict will amount to no more than a "rule clarification", prohibiting its use in the future but leaving the results so far this season to stand.Certainlytoday's court of appeal hearing combined emotionally passionate outbursts and strong words in equal measure – unusual for debates about technical issues which usually grind away with a degree of formality bordering on the dull. However, when Ferrari's lawyer, Nigel Tozzi QC, opened the proceedings with an electrifying attack on Ross Brawn, accusing the team principal of being "a person of supreme arrogance", it was clear that this was going to be an unusually feisty exchange.Ferrari, Red Bull Racing, Renault and BMW Sauber were all appealing against a decision by the stewards at the Australian grand prix last month rejecting their protest that the diffusers on the Brawn – and the new Toyota and Williams as well – did not conform to the regulations. They claimed that if the diffusers were deemed to be legal, the FIA would effectively be creating a "two tier" formula one with three teams in a position where they could consolidate a significant performance edge while the end of the field were left catching up.Tozzi's opening address brought wry smiles to the faces of many who recalled that the British engineer was the key technical driving force behind the five of Michael Schumacher's seven world championship titles which were won with the famous Italian team. Tozzi eventually concluded his 90-minute speech by returning to his original theme. "Only a person of supreme arrogance would think he is right when so many of his esteemed colleagues would disagree," he said of Brawn.The arcane technical arguments relating to the legality of the diffusers centred on the positioning of certain apertures in the undertrays of the cars in question. But Tozzi railed: "Anyone with a command of English will tell you it's a hole, so do not let someone attempting to be clever with words defeat the express purpose of the rules. The appeal is not because we have not made the most of an opportunity, but because Brawn, Toyota and Williams have not acted within the regulations."The Ferrari lawyer's argument was backed up by the contention of the Renault team representative Andrew Ford who claimed that the French formula one team had abandoned such a diffuser design last year when the FIA deemed it illegal. Back came Tozzi, still not mincing his words. "The position of the FIA is baffling," he told the panel of judges. "We urge you to save the FIA from itself."He also criticised the FIA race director, Charlie Whiting, for "getting it wrong" and "not understanding the point". Tozzi argued that the credibility of Max Mosley, the FIA president, would be badly damaged in the event of the court dismissing the appeals. "If the appeal is dismissed, then the claims by the FIA that they want to make the sport more attractive and reduce costs will sound hollow," he said.But a defiant Brawn said: "We didn't consider this to be a radical new design. It was an innovative approach of an existing idea, and formula one is all about innovative design. It's a cornerstone and objective of the sport."Despite the appeal, all the protesting teams admit they have been developing their own "double diffuser" just in case its legality is upheld. "We are developing a similar solution despite thinking it does not comply with the idea of the rules and it costs a lot of money," said Mario Theissen, the BMW motorsport president."We don't want to go down this path, but we have no choice. We have to develop it in case it is declared legal."BrawnJenson ButtonWilliamsToyotaFormula oneMotor sportguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Ferrari: Brawn 'supremely arrogant'

• Arguments fly during opening exchanges in Paris• Brawn accuses former employers of being 'vindictive'Ross Brawn has been described as "a person of supreme arrogance" by Ferrari's lawyer as the hearing into formula one's diffuser row opened today.Ferrari, Renault, Red Bull Racing and BMW Sauber squared up against Brawn GP, Toyota and Williams in front of five judges representing motor racing's International Court of Appeal.At the heart of the matter is the conceptual design of the diffuser – an aerodynamic body part that aids performance – towards the rear of the cars being used by the three teams in the firing line.At the FIA headquarters, overlooking the Place de la Concorde in Paris, Brawn and motor sport's world governing body were singled out for criticism.Nigel Tozzi QC, Ferrari's legal representative, drew reference to an emotional statement made by Brawn as part of his team's submissions. In it, Brawn claims the appeal is "vindictive," and "for people too slow off the mark".However, Tozzi concluded his 90-minute opening remarks by claiming that "only a person of supreme arrogance would think he is right when so many of his esteemed colleagues would disagree".Brawn GP, Toyota and Williams have designed what has become known as a "double-decker diffuser", central to which are two apertures that increase airflow, so aiding downforce that in turn increases speed.Ferrari, Renault, Red Bull Racing and BMW Sauber insist there is nothing in the technical regulations that allow for such "holes".As Tozzi noted: "Anyone with a command of English will tell you it is a hole, so do not let someone attempting to be clever with words defeat the express purpose of the rules."The appeal is not because we have not made the most of an opportunity, but because Brawn, Toyota and Williams have not acted within the regulations."The FIA, and in particular the technical director Charlie Whiting, also came under fire, with Tozzi accusing them of "getting it wrong, and not understanding the point".That appeared to be made clear when Renault's legal representative, Andrew Ford, noted the FIA and Whiting had early last season ruled illegal a design by the French manufacturer similar to that currently being used by Toyota.As Ford remarked: "It is not that Renault missed the boat, as Brawn have pointed out, it is because the FIA said it was illegal." Ford added: "It was at that point the diffuser was abandoned."Ford has confirmed Renault has a prototype diffuser ready to go, potentially for this weekend's race in China, should the appeal be dismissed.Tozzi continued: "The position of the FIA is totally baffling … we urge you to save the FIA from itself."It was pointed out that crucial to the seven teams without the new diffuser is the cost of redevelopment as the part concerned has a bearing on several other elements of a car.Tozzi added: "It was [the FIA president] Max Mosley who said recently that costs must be reduced by limiting the opportunities for technical innovation."If the appeal is dismissed then the claims by the FIA they want to make the sport more attractive and reduce costs will sound hollow."BrawnFerrariToyotaWilliamsSauberRed BullRenaultFormula oneMotor sportguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Furious Ferrari casts eyes at Le Mans

May 1 (GMM) Not since Ferrari built but never raced an Indycar in the 1980s has the Italian marque's relationship with the FIA been at such a low point.

F1 could live without Ferrari - Mosley

May 2 (GMM) Formula one could live without the sport's most famous, successful and longest-serving team, Max Mosley insists. The FIA president's disquieting comments come after war threatened to break out between the Paris body and Maranello based Ferrari, enraged at the introduction of budget caps.

Ferrari sticks with KERS for 'B' car

May 6 (GMM) While BMW drops KERS for Spain, Ferrari has confirmed that the controversial energy re-use technology will still feature on the F60 package this weekend in Barcelona.

Rivals praise Ferrari's step forwards

Massa pace a concern for the front-runners Ferrari may have admitted to a 'stupid' and 'serious' error regarding Kimi Raikkonen's qualifying strategy, but the team was praised by its rivals on Saturday...